You might not be a fan of darkish matter, the hypothetical particle that makes up the majority of the universe. And it is true that the darkish matter speculation has its flaws – and naturally, we’ve not discovered a single darkish matter particle but. However the reality is that the options are a lot worse.
Universe is filled with inexplicable mysteries (which is what makes astronomers and astrophysicists comfortable to work), and plenty of of those mysteries encompass gravity. Whereas we watch stars as we revolve across the facilities of our galaxies, we discover that they’re transferring too quick given the quantity of seen matter that may maintain them in these orbits on account of its gravity.
galaxies the thrill round clusters of galaxies can also be transferring too quick given the quantity of seen mass within the clusters. The identical clusters distort the background gentle an excessive amount of. Even giant constructions arose too rapidly in our universe with out an extra supply of mass.
Linked: Ought to we be so certain of the existence of darkish matter?
The perfect speculation that scientists want to elucidate to all these scattered observations is that there’s a new sort of particle often called darkish matterthat inhabits the cosmos. This particle can be virtually utterly invisible (therefore the identify), hardly ever (if ever) interacting with atypical matter. This concept isn’t as far-fetched because it appears; neutrino are particles with exactly these properties. They do not have sufficient mass to elucidate darkish matter, however they present that such particles can exist.
However the darkish matter speculation isn’t excellent. Pc simulations of galaxy progress counsel that darkish matter-dominated galaxies will need to have an extremely excessive density at their facilities. Observations of actual galaxies do present the next density of their cores, however removed from ample, as these simulations predicted. As well as, simulations of the evolution of darkish matter within the universe predict that every galaxy will need to have a whole bunch of smaller satellites, whereas observations persistently fail.
Case for MOND
On condition that the darkish matter speculation is not excellent – and that we do not have direct proof for the existence of any candidate particles – it is price exploring different choices.
Considered one of these choices was introduced again within the Nineteen Seventies, together with the unique concept of darkish matter, when an astronomer Vera Rubin first found the issue of too quick motion of stars inside galaxies. However as an alternative of including a brand new ingredient to the universe, the choice adjustments the recipe, altering how gravity works on a galactic scale. The unique concept known as MOND, which suggests “modified Newtonian dynamics”, however the identify additionally applies to the overall household of theories that stem from this authentic idea.
With MOND, you just about get what the label says. On the dimensions of the planet or the photo voltaic system Newtongravity works simply effective (besides, in fact, while you want the extra detailed gravity calculations supplied by normal idea of relativity). However when you get large, as normal F=in with which we’re acquainted will not be solely relevant, and the relation between pressure and acceleration obeys a distinct rule.
In MOND, there is no such thing as a want for further particles to elucidate the observations—only a slight tweak to the gravitational pressure is sufficient. And for the reason that MOND gravity setting is particularly designed to elucidate the motion of stars inside galaxies, it naturally does so very nicely. The speculation additionally doesn’t endure from the overproduction of satellites and intensely excessive galactic darkish matter nuclei.
However MOND is much from excellent. Modifications made to gravity to elucidate the motion of stars make it troublesome to elucidate the motion of galaxies inside clusters and the lensing of background gentle. And MOND isn’t a very relativistic idea (all trendy bodily theories should be suitable with particular idea of relativity). An equal replace to MOND, known as TeVeS, can compete head-to-head with normal relativity—and falls far behind. Fashions primarily based on modified gravity have critical issues in explaining the expansion of construction within the Universe, options area microwave background and rather more – all locations the place darkish matter works fairly nicely.
There isn’t a idea like MOND that may clarify each single statement in relation to darkish matter; all of them fail not less than one take a look at. Whereas MOND can nonetheless be correct in relation to galaxy rotation curves, there are sufficient observations to inform us that we Nonetheless darkish matter is required to exist within the universe.
No, the darkish matter speculation isn’t excellent. However once more, there is no such thing as a scientific speculation. When evaluating competing hypotheses, scientists can’t merely depend on their intestine or select the one which sounds cooler or appears simpler. We should observe the clues wherever they lead. In almost 50 years nobody has give you a idea like MOND that might clarify the wealth of knowledge we have now concerning the universe. It does not make MOND incorrecthowever that makes it a a lot weaker different to darkish matter.
Study extra by listening to the Ask an Astronaut podcast, out there on iTunes. (will open in a brand new tab) and askaspaceman.com (will open in a brand new tab). Ask your query on Twitter utilizing the hashtag #AskASpaceman or by following Paul. @PaulMattSutter (will open in a brand new tab) and fb.com/PaulMattSutter (will open in a brand new tab).
Observe us on Twitter @spacedot.com or at fb.