The BC Medical Providers Fee has filed for an injunction towards Telus Well being’s Life Plus subscription program.
The injunction, which was filed in BC Supreme Court docket on Thursday, alleges this system violates the Medicare Safety Act, in keeping with the province.
“It is rather vital to help the Well being Care Act, which is in place to protect our publicly managed and fiscally sustainable well being care system for British Columbia,” Well being Minister Adrian Dix stated at a press convention Thursday.
The Well being Care Act ensures that entry to obligatory medical care must be based mostly on want, not a person’s skill to pay. Medical insurance premiums are allowed so long as residents will not be denied protection for medically obligatory hospital and doctor companies.
Dix says the ban is just for considerations concerning the charges charged by the Life Plus program, not different features of Telus Well being.
“We’re doing vital work on numerous recordsdata [and] well being points with Telus, and so they’re an excellent company in BC,” he stated. “It simply displays features of that program.”
The Minister of Well being says that he can not remark additional on the main points of the submission as a result of the matter is earlier than the court docket.
Telus pushed again towards the claims on its web site, saying the LifePlus program charges are “strictly for uninsured companies, not publicly insured companies,” including that publicly insured companies are billed beneath the affected person’s medical service plan.
This system prices $4,650 for the primary 12 months and $3,600 in all subsequent years.
In a teleconference with reporters, Juggi Sihota, vp of Telus Well being, denied claims that sufferers whose docs joined Telus Life Plus couldn’t obtain major care if they didn’t pay the charges.
“The companies we offer by means of the life program are for preventive care. If a preventive care affected person comes to make use of a service and has a request for an insured service, that doctor is free to supply that care to that affected person at his or her personal will. .”
Sihota didn’t say whether or not Telus would struggle the ban, however stated it “welcomes authorized motion.”
“Proper now we’re blindsided … and I feel that is very disrespectful and it is a disgrace.” We’re dissatisfied with the route chosen by the Medical Providers Fee.”