Sanctions in opposition to Russia don’t return | letter

Simon Jenkins (Ruble soars and Putin stronger than ever – our sanctions are again, 29 July) writes that the sanctions are “meant to scare folks into stopping their princes”. All through his work, he presents a really instrumentalist view of those restrictions, however says nothing concerning the moral part.

In case you study {that a} buddy is partaking in extremely immoral habits, you could confront them, and in the event that they persist you could select to distance your self. I doubt if anybody would suppose that withholding friendship will pressure them to alter; you simply don’t desire something to do with them anymore. You’re now not working in a shared ethical universe.

I feel there are a lot of folks on this nation who would reasonably bear the excessive value of gasoline than purchase Russian fuel – on ethical grounds. After all, the issue with moral restrictions is the place to attract the road; if Russia, why not Saudi Arabia, China or Israel? That is usually a grey space, not least as a result of we within the “enlightened west” are removed from morally pure. However invading a neighboring nation, with out provocation, is as clear a violation of the worldwide order as yow will discover, and it can’t be tolerated, no matter the fee.
David Sutherland

Mr. Jenkins’ well-argued article misses the purpose. Whereas he rightly states that “the interdependence of world economies, lengthy seen as an instrument of peace, has been changed into a weapon of warfare”, he fully misses the truth that the deliberate sanctions regime in opposition to Russia for its invasion of Ukraine is primarily aimed toward breaking the interdependence Russia’s dependence – its correct integration – on this planet financial system. Simply as Angela Merkel foolishly believed that integrating Russia into the world financial system by importing its cheaply priced fuel would scale back the menace, so now too many, together with Mr Jenkins, miss out on that sanctions successfully isolate Russia from the world financial system. “Low-cost” power from Russia has come at an enormous value. Nevertheless it’s higher to pay the fee now than to attend till Russia stalks Lithuania or Poland.
Scott Blau
Keighley, West Yorkshire

As I learn Simon Jenkins’ piece on sanctions in opposition to Russia, my spouse wept over the 50 Ukrainian prisoners of warfare killed within the Russian assault on Olenivka jail in Donetsk area. They have been Azov troopers, who defended Mariupol.

Mr. Jenkins could also be proper concerning the financial worth of sanctions, however this one-dimensional, gas-heated view misses one thing necessary. The sanctions should not only a instrument to knock Russia’s financial system “again to the stone age”, however reasonably a strategy to present solidarity with the Ukrainian folks.

Shutting down the embargo whereas persevering with to provide weapons? Come on, it is like treating a damaged limb with painkillers, however with out utilizing any sturdy bandages. The scenario is getting extra painful and harder to deal with for Russia. The sanctions, mixed with Ukraine’s successes on the battlefield, made Russia extra inclined in the direction of peace talks. Right here, 400km from the entrance line, we see Russia shedding face.

Since February 24, Ukrainians see the world in black and white. Even when our folks die from Russian missiles, there is no such thing as a room for “Sure, however …” We do not perceive that. We reserve the precise to disregard all these “buts”.

I want to thank the UK for its assist and pray that the battle ends with our victory.
Bohdan Kisil
Kyiv, Ukraine

Obtained an opinion on something you learn within the Guardian at present? please e mail we your letter and it will likely be thought-about for publication.

About the author


Leave a Comment