Dayton Boots owes staff almost $500,000 in wages paid with firm reward playing cards, a tribunal has confirmed

The Employment Requirements Tribunal (EST) has rejected an utility by Vancouver-based Dayton Boots to evaluation a choice that discovered the corporate owes almost half 1,000,000 {dollars} in wages to staff who had been beforehand compensated with Dayton Boots retailer reward playing cards.

The case started in October 2020 when two individuals filed confidential complaints with the BC Division of Employment Requirements, alleging that Dayton Boots was deducting 50 p.c of workers’ wages and making up for the deductions with reward playing cards.

The investigation checked out employment information supplied by Dayton Boots and located pay statements starting in June 2020 displaying payroll deductions labeled “different deductions,” then “Dayton Card” and at last “Dayton Reward Card.”

In line with tribunal paperwork, firm proprietor Eric Hutchingame initially defined that Dayton Boots workers had been “required to put on the shop’s merchandise when at work, so Dayton Boots developed a means for the employer to pay the price of the staff’ clothes by incorporating them into their wage construction”.

The corporate additionally claimed that the staff had verbally agreed to be paid $600 per week, plus $600 per week in merchandise credit score.

Through the investigation and subsequent enchantment, the corporate additionally argued that the reward playing cards had been by no means supposed as wages; that reward playing cards had been paid on high of wage; that the wage statements are incorrect and that the staff had been by no means supposed to obtain the said gross quantity; and that it could be unreasonable to require Dayton Boots to pay the quantities proven as deductions as a result of many workers didn’t work a full 40-hour week, in keeping with the paperwork.

Salaries have to be paid in Canadian foreign money

The EST delegate’s resolution discovered towards Dayton Boots and Hutchingham that they violated a number of sections of the Employment Requirements Act (ESA), together with part 20, which requires wages to be paid in Canadian foreign money, and part 21, which says employers can not retain , refuse or demand the fee of any a part of the wages of workers for any objective.

The choice calculated that 71 workers are owed $610,417.68 in wages, plus curiosity. It states that Hutchingame, as the only director of Dayton Boots, is personally liable for about $556,000 of that quantity.

Dayton Boots and Hutchingame each appealed the choice.

In April 2022, the appeals court docket rejected all however one in all their arguments — agreeing that some workers who stay exterior the province usually are not coated by the ESA, and due to this fact their wages shouldn’t be included within the calculation.

The enchantment resolution ordered a recalculation that excluded out-of-province workers, decreasing the wages owed by the corporate to $484,995.33 and adjusting Hutchingame’s legal responsibility to $446,472.04.

‘Model Ambassadors’

Dayton Boots and Hutchingame then sought a evaluation of the choice on enchantment, arguing that new proof allegedly confirmed that 36 of the 71 people initially awarded stipends had been in truth “model ambassadors” and never precise Dayton Boots workers performing precise work.

The three-judge panel stated the brand new proof didn’t meet the check for reconsideration as a result of Dayton Boots and Hutchingame had themselves claimed the 71 workers and supplied proof to assist the actual fact once they submitted workbooks for the 71 to the tribunal.

“The candidates have repeatedly alleged and even confirmed that the people, together with the model ambassadors, had been their workers,” the panel stated in upholding the recount resolution.

About the author


Leave a Comment